Who is John Tanner? All about the key figure associated with the Aileen Wuornos case

Aileen Wuornos features in the Netflix documentary Aileen: Queen of the Serial Killers, and one name that stands out in the record is John Tanner. He served as state attorney in Florida during the period when investigators bring the case to court, and he leads the prosecution that secured the first conviction.

The documentary revisits the crimes, the arrest, and the courtroom tapes. John Tanner appears again and again as the public face of the state’s case. His courtroom statements, media comments, and charging decisions shape how the story reaches the jury and the wider audience.

---

Case overview of Aileen Wuornos

Between late 1989 and late 1990, seven men were found shot and left on Florida roadways. Evidence included pawn slips tied to the victim's property, fingerprints from a crashed vehicle, and taped calls set up with Tyria Moore that led to a confession.

Wuornos' arrest followed a multi-county investigation (Image via Pexels)

Wuornos was arrested in January 1991 and later received multiple death sentences. The documentary’s archival record shows routine police work knitting the cases together, then moving into trial.

---

Who is John Tanner in the Aileen Wuornos case?

John Tanner was the elected state attorney whose office tried the first case, the killing of Richard Mallory. A born-again Christian by public description and reportedly an anti-pornography crusader at the time, Tanner framed the murders as calculated crimes.

He pushed a narrow theory of motive, emphasized robbery, and opposed claims of self-defense. His presence at the podium, flanked by local press interest, made him a central figure for viewers of the trial footage and for the jurors who heard it live.

Tanner’s role also extended to decisions about what jurors could hear. Under Florida’s Williams Rule, the state introduced evidence from other shootings to show a pattern. That approach, common in Florida practice, increased the weight of the state’s narrative and reduced the case’s dependence on a single incident.

---

Aileen Wuornos' trial strategy and John Tanner’s stance

At trial, the defense focused on sexual violence claims and on Mallory’s past. The state, led by Tanner, insisted the shootings fit a robbery pattern. His words from the era still circulate in coverage of the film:

“This was not so much a crime of passion as it was a crime of absolute control and domination over the victim.” -John Tanner said of Richard Mallory's murder in archival footage

The aforementioned statement is from archival footage used in the documentary and captures how the prosecution framed intent.

The resulting split has long been discussed. Defense accounts stressed a life history of abuse and alleged assaults during encounters. Prosecutors stressed route, method, gun, property, and repeated elements. The jury convicted on the Mallory count; Wuornos then entered no-contest pleas in other cases. The sentence phase produced death, later carried out in 2002.

---

What happened to John Tanner after the Aileen Wuornos case?

After the Aileen Wuornos trial period, John Tanner returned to private practice, then later served again as state attorney. Public reports describe community posts, legal commentary on older capital cases, and a low public profile in recent years. He remains linked to the case in documentaries and news features, where his trial posture is replayed in clips and quoted in print.

Aileen: Queen of the Serial Killers (Image via Netflix)

In the Netflix film, his past comments act as a marker for how the state treated the case in court and on camera. That is why he figures prominently when Aileen: Queen of the Serial Killers asks viewers to assess the courtroom record alongside police tapes, archived newscasts, and prison interviews.

---