Jake Paul recently shared his thoughts on the UFC's latest fight announcements while referencing the Muhammad Ali Act saga.Earlier this week, Dana White took to social media to announce a host of fights. He confirmed that UFC 324 will be headlined by a Justin Gaethje vs. Paddy Pimblett interim lightweight title fight, with an exciting Kayla Harrison vs. Amanda Nunes women's bantamweight title clash as the co-main event. Additionally, Alexander Volkanovski will face Diego Lopes in a featherweight title rematch at UFC 325.While some were hyped about the upcoming fights, others weren't so happy about the matchmaking. Many questioned the Gaethje-Pimblett interim title fight at UFC 324, given Arman Tsarukyan's recent run in the promotion and the Liverpudlian's lack of wins against top-ranked opponents.Many were also critical of Lopes getting another title shot against Volkanovski over contenders like Lerone Murphy and Movsar Evloev. In a recent X post, Paul took a shot at the UFC brass for their matchmaking and their efforts to amend the Muhammad Ali Act, writing:"They want to abolish the Muhammad Ali Act because they claim they want to give boxing the best fighting the best… So why are all the fans crying foul about these new UFC fights they announced? And for sure, Harrison [vs.] Nunes should be its own main event."When Jake Paul clarified his stance on the Muhammad Ali Act and potential reforms in boxingIn September, Jake Paul shared his thoughts on Dana White and TKO seeking to bring about a massive change to the sport of boxing by amending the Muhammad Ali Act, an important piece of legislation that was signed in 2000 to protect boxers from potentially exploitative promoters, commissions, and officials.During a press conference for his now-scrapped Gervonta Davis fight (via @MMAJunkie on X), Paul said:“I just don’t think it should be a thing. Absolutely not. It’s there for a reason, and the Muhammad Ali Act is very, very important. Yeah, 100% [it is a negative reform]. Which is what we want to avoid, and MVP [Most Valuable Promotions] has always been fighter first, and we always care about the fighters, and we know what these fighters have to go through. So you don’t want them to be taken advantage of. I think getting rid of the act would lead to things in those situations."